The durability and potential of your retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system depend on the database you choose for it. In RAG information retrieval, vector databases and knowledge graphs serve distinct roles: the former focuses on similarities between vector representations, while the latter focuses on relationships between entities. 

In this guide, we will cover:

* What exactly knowledge graphs and vector databases are, and how they work within an RAG AI system.
* The process through which RAG retrieves and augments information to generate user-friendly responses.
* When you should go for a knowledge graph, and when you should use vector search.
* An in-depth comparison of their data models, along with their scalability and retrieval performance. 
* A look into the advantages and limitations of both, and whether or not they can be combined for a better yield.
* How you can use real-world tools and frameworks to build RAG pipelines that are strong and scalable.

By the end, you will have a solid idea of which setup will work best for your goals, data, and production requirements. 

Let’s get into it.

## What is a knowledge graph?

A knowledge graph is, well, a graph of knowledge. It’s a structured data model that represents entities such as people, places, numbers, and other data points, along with the relationships between them. Using nodes and edges, a knowledge graph organizes information and deciphers the connections within it to answer complex or hidden queries for users. 

A graph structure enables the system to apply reason to the data and uncover the real connections needed to answer complex queries. 

In AI applications and RAG, knowledge graphs are primarily used for contextual reasoning and compliance monitoring, where the depth and explainability of answers are paramount.

## What is a vector database?

A [vector database](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-a-vector-database) runs on vector embeddings. These are more easily understood as numerical representations of text, images, and even audio that capture meaning instead of full-fledged keywords. These vectors are indexed using similarity search algorithms, such as cosine similarity or HNSW. 

The most popular vector databases, such as Pinecone and Weaviate, power RAG apps by allowing fast retrieval across massive datasets. Most modern semantic and generative AI systems use vector retrieval as their backbone. 

## How does RAG work?

[Retrieval-augmented generation](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) is a power-up for large language models (LLMs). It grounds their outputs in external data and adds a smarter, context-aware layer. It works in three steps that are seemingly very simple:

![How RAG Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_RAG_Works_4bbeaa79f9.png)

1. A retriever traverses the knowledge base or vector database to find documents similar to the user’s query. 
2. The retrieved documents and their context are handed off to the LLM.
3. The LLM generates an answer that’s supported by the context and addresses the user’s query.

With this externally fetched context, the likelihood of AI hallucinations or generic answers is significantly reduced.

## Do you need a vector database for RAG?

A dedicated vector database can significantly improve retrieval precision, but it isn’t always a prerequisite for a functional RAG pipeline. 

Plenty of teams use hybrid search engines that combine [full-text search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/how-full-text-search-engines-work), keyword extraction, and vector embeddings within a single layer. The benefit of doing this is that they don’t need to rely on multiple services or heavy infrastructure. 

For example, Meilisearch offers a simple way to set up your workflow through a single <code>/chat</code> endpoint. It can perform retrieval and generation in a single API call, unlike the traditional multi-step RAG approach. 

## When should you use a knowledge graph for RAG?

A knowledge graph is ideal for RAG systems that have structured or interconnected data. It excels in scenarios where the ‘how’ is just as important as the ‘why,’ such as in medical research, financial compliance, analytics, and business data. 

A knowledge graph enables multi-hop reasoning by modeling entities such as people, organizations, roles, and products. It understands the relationships between these entities and helps your LLM trace how the answer was retrieved, not just the information. 

## When is a vector database better for RAG?

A vector database is a good option when you’re dealing with unstructured or high-volume semantic data. This can include documents, support tickets, research papers, and so on. 

In all situations where meaning matters more than the relationships, you want to use a [vector database for RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/vector-dbs-rag). 

Since it stores the data in the form of vector embeddings, the retriever can use semantic similarity and deliver the relevant information you’re looking for. 

All of this makes vector databases the go-to option for search, summarization, and content summarization. Unlike knowledge graphs, they scale easily and return results in milliseconds.

## What are the key differences between knowledge graphs and vector databases?

If you’re looking for the main difference between [knowledge graphs and vector databases](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/graph-rag-vs-vector-rag), you’ll find it in how they model and retrieve information. 

Let’s take a look at some specifics for both. 

![Knowledge graph vs vector database.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/Knowledge_graph_vs_vector_database_4d6864f956.png)

Need reasoning and traceability? Knowledge graphs are your best bet. 

On the other hand, if you want semantic matching and scalability, go with vector databases. 

That said, modern RAG systems often combine the best of both worlds for quick recall and solid reasoning.

## What are the advantages of using knowledge graphs in RAG?

Knowledge graphs provide the structure and reasoning that enable RAG systems to understand how data points are connected, rather than treating each point in isolation.

The benefits of employing knowledge graphs in RAG include:

1. **Relational reasoning on point:** Knowledge graphs capture relationships between entities and are helpful in domain-specific contexts such as legal or medical research.
2. **Easy to explain:** Developers enjoy the traceability of knowledge graphs through nodes and edges because it gives results that can be audited.
3. **Upholding the context:** Data linked through knowledge graphs helps the LLM maintain context coherence across future prompts or windows.
4. **Semantic precision:** Knowledge graphs reduce noise and improve the quality of retrieval.

## What are the advantages of using vector databases in RAG?

Here’s why RAG pipelines rely heavily on vector databases:

1. **Effortless scalability:** Since vector databases can handle millions of embeddings without a hitch, you never have to worry about increased latency across large-scale datasets. 
2. **High speed and performance:** Vector databases can deliver results within milliseconds without compromising accuracy or quality.
3. **Easy handling of unstructured data:** They’re optimized to work smoothly with text, audio, and even image embeddings. This is particularly useful in chatbots.
4. **Flexible and low-cost:** Their architecture supports easy scaling without complex infrastructure.

Modern retrieval systems, such as Meilisearch, [combine vector search, full-text search](https://www.meilisearch.com/solutions/hybrid-search), and reranking in a single engine. This hybrid approach targets both speed and reasoning for retrieval.

## What are the limitations of knowledge graphs in RAG?

Even though they are helpful in specific cases, knowledge graphs have limitations that you need to keep in mind before putting all your retrieval eggs in this basket: 

1. **Hard to develop:** As effective as knowledge graphs are, building and maintaining them takes significant time. Development teams need to work on schema design, ontology mapping, and, of course, manual relationship curation.
2. **Can’t scale as easily:** More edges and nodes mean multiple hops. These traversals degrade retrieval performance. 
3. **Don’t handle unstructured data well:** When the content is text-heavy, it doesn’t fit well into node-edge structures. This limits recall breadth and might limit responses.
4. **Maintenance is expensive:** Frequent schema updates and data versioning increase overhead.

## What are the limitations of vector databases in RAG?

Vector databases aren’t without drawbacks either. Let’s look at a few:

1. **No transparency:** Since the similarity scores are based on math, it’s tough to trace why certain documents were retrieved. As such, you cannot justify outputs either. 
2. **Not for complex relationships:** Vector databases don’t do well with structured relationships because they can’t support entity hierarchies or established relationships between them.
3. **Operational complexity:** Ever heard of ‘glue code’? That’s what you get when integrating vector databases with retrievers and generators. It leads to a high infrastructure overhead that nobody wants. The best modern hybrid systems have already simplified this. For example, Meilisearch does so by bundling retrieval and generation into a single endpoint, reducing the number of orchestration layers and the LLM's call volume.

## How can you combine knowledge graphs and vector databases in RAG?

Combining a knowledge graph and vector database in a single RAG pipeline enables teams to capture both semantic similarity and structured relationships.* *As a result, you get stronger reasoning and pinpoint precision.

Let’s take the example of Meilisearch. It handles high-recall retrieval and grounding by running a hybrid search. In addition, a knowledge graph layer can be set up to trace entity relationships and perform multi-hop reasoning. 

This architecture is useful for enterprise-scale data where both speed and explainability are a must. Meilisearch’s <code>/chat</code> endpoint handles both retrieval and generation in a single call, while the knowledge graph adds a traceability layer on top.

## How does semantic search differ in knowledge graphs and vector databases?

[Semantic search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/semantic-search) behaves differently across these two systems because of how each one represents meaning.

In knowledge graphs, meaning revolves around entities and their relationships. The retrieval then depends on these logical connections and relationships. You’ll find it most useful in domains such as law or healthcare, where there’s no room for error. 

In vector databases, semantic search is tied to embeddings that rely on similarity algorithms to generate answers for users. It’s fast and efficient. For example, if a user searches for ‘HR policy’, it will find content by matching the query with relevant documents, such as ‘employee handbook.’ You won’t even need to define this relationship.

## What are popular vector databases used for RAG?

Let’s explore the most commonly used vector DB tools: 

* **Meilisearch:** The perfect modern hybrid blend. Meilisearch is a search engine with a built-in vector store and hybrid retrieval. It also provides the `/chat` API, which unifies understanding, reranking, and generation into a single layer. Here’s a not-so-secret fact: it often replaces a standalone vector database in production-grade RAG pipelines.
* **Pinecone:** A staple in the industry when it comes to managed vector DBs. It’s known for its low latency and high reliability.
* **Weaviate:** An open-source option that supports hybrid search and schema-based reasoning. Plus, it integrates with most major embedding models.
* **Qdrant:** Qdrant is popular because it is lightweight and developer-friendly. It’s been optimized primarily for real-time similarity search.
* **Milvus:** This one has been designed specifically for enterprise workloads with a distributed architecture and high-throughput performance.

## Examples of knowledge graph platforms for RAG

Let’s now look at some examples of knowledge graph platforms that have been popular with development teams. 

* **Neo4j:** One of the most widely used graph databases. It is the ideal option if you want to store entities and edges with Cypher queries that support semantic reasoning.
* **Amazon Neptune:** Amazon Neptune is a fully managed graph service, optimized for RDF and property graph models.
* **Ontotext GraphDB:** As the name suggests, this one was designed for ontology-driven graphs and semantic search. It is widely used in sectors such as publishing and life sciences. 
* **ArangoDB:** A multi-model database supporting both graph and document queries for flexible, hybrid RAG applications.

## How do you choose between a knowledge graph and a vector database for RAG?

The perfect foundation for your RAG system depends on your data structure, reasoning needs, and operational goals. Here are the factors you must consider before finalizing this decision:

* **Data type:** The data you’re working with is the main factor that determines the foundation you need. If your data is structured, go for a knowledge graph. If it’s unstructured, go with a vector DB. 
* **Explainability:** Choose a knowledge graph when you need traceability and reasoning paths. Vector databases excel when you only need similarity-based retrieval.
* **Scale and performance:** Vector databases handle massive datasets and low-latency retrieval better. Knowledge graphs give up retrieval speed but make up for it with deeper reasoning and richer context.
* **Maintenance and integration:** Knowledge graphs require schema definition and maintenance, whereas vector databases integrate easily into modern AI pipelines.

If you want a deeper understanding of RAG, here are the different [types of RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types) to know, along with the [RAG techniques](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-techniques) and [tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools) that drive the modern AI wave.

## Choosing the right path: knowledge graph vs. vector database for RAG

Modern RAG systems are as effective as they are because of the foundations on which they are built. Both knowledge graphs and vector databases are a part of this foundation. 

The choice between them will always depend on your needs, and most teams today lean toward a hybrid approach to better prepare for future needs.

Knowledge graph vs. vector database for RAG: which is best?

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is revolutionizing how businesses use artificial intelligence to interact with data. By enabling enhanced AI responses, organizations can leverage AI to complete tasks faster, make more informed decisions, and deliver more effective customer support. 

Here are the main topics we cover in this article:

* Businesses use RAG mainly for customer support, contract reviews, enterprise search, and reporting.
* Industries such as finance, law, healthcare, retail, and technology benefit most from RAG systems.
* Common challenges of RAG for business include data privacy, integration, cost, and scalability, all of which require robust testing.
* RAG implementation involves setting goals, connecting data, selecting tools, fine-tuning models, and continuous monitoring to ensure optimal performance.
* Best practices for utilizing RAG in your business include data cleaning, user training, system security, and performance monitoring.
* New trends focus on agentic RAG, multimodal data, and domain-specific tools for businesses.

Let’s explore each of these points in more depth, starting with defining retrieval-augmented generation and what it means for business. 

## What is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for business?

[Retrieval-augmented generation](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag), or RAG, is a system that enhances the context of a large language model (LLM) and improves its responses. It works by pulling recent, relevant information from trusted sources and using it to generate its response. This means that the AI model can augment its training data with new insights and provide more accurate, context-aware answers. 

In a business setting, using RAG in an AI system enhances customer support, market analysis, and knowledge management. It also helps teams work more efficiently. 

Using RAG [internal search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/internal-search), teams can access relevant information more quickly, communicate more effectively, and make informed choices backed by accurate data.

## How does RAG work in business AI?

For RAG to be effective, it must be connected to an external knowledge source. This could include business databases, internal documents, or online sources. 

Once connected, the RAG workflow follows three major steps:

1. **Business data retrieval:** Based on a user query, the language model determines which additional information is needed to provide a correct, relevant answer. It then searches the external resources it has access to for any helpful information related to the query. 
2. **Augmentation:** In this stage, the retrieved data is added to the language model’s input. This provides the necessary context to ground its reasoning. For example, if a user asks, ‘What is the trend in support requests over the past three months?’ RAG accesses the customer support database and retrieves the information for the last three months. The final LLM input then becomes the initial user question plus the retrieved numbers from the previous three months. 
3. **Response generation:** The model leverages both its existing knowledge and new information to generate a precise, informed response. 

In a business setting, this process can help employees get insights from company records. It can also allow customer service representatives to provide fact-based answers. 

RAG bridges the gap between business knowledge and real-time understanding, making AI responses more factual.

## What are the benefits of RAG for businesses?

Retrieval-augmented generation helps companies make the most of their data. Here’s how:

* **Improved decision-making:** RAG provides business leaders with access to accurate, up-to-date information from multiple business sources. For example, a retail company owner can use RAG to analyze sales reports, customer feedback, and market data before launching a new product. 
* **Better customer support:** Customer service teams can deliver quick, accurate answers by combining stored knowledge with real-time retrieval. A bank’s chatbot, for instance, can use RAG to retrieve policy updates and provide personalized answers with the help of this extra information.
* **Increased productivity and cost savings:** Employees spend less time searching for data and more time focusing on tasks that matter. This improves efficiency and reduces operational costs.
* **Higher accuracy and reduced hallucinations:** Since RAG relies on verified data, it limits the risk of AI generating wrong or made-up information. 
* **Competitive edge:** Businesses using RAG can respond more quickly to market changes, provide better insights, and maintain stronger customer relationships. A consulting firm, for example, can use RAG to summarize industry reports across multiple fields and produce informed recommendations within minutes.

Overall, RAG helps organizations work smarter by combining the depth of company knowledge with the speed and understanding of modern AI.

## What are examples of RAG applications in business?

Here are some ways RAG can help businesses enhance performance and deliver value to their customers. 

![RAG applications in business.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/RAG_applications_in_business_62f59ded4c.png)

### 1. Customer support

Customer support representatives can now confidently use AI systems to provide real-time answers. 

In the telecommunications industry, for example, a customer support representative can use RAG-powered chatbots to get prompt answers to billing-related questions and network issues. This improves the company’s response time while providing personalized answers to the customer.

### 2. Contract analysis

RAG can help review and interpret complex contracts. It retrieves relevant clauses, compares terms, and highlights potential risks in a contract. Law firms and large corporations use this system to speed up contract reviews. 

With RAG, reviewers cut through the noise and gain a bird's-eye view of what needs to be acted upon before approval. It reduces manual effort, prevents oversight, and ensures compliance with legal standards.

### 3. Enterprise search 

Businesses often struggle with data scattered across multiple platforms. RAG-based enterprise search tools help by retrieving the most relevant information from different systems and presenting it clearly and concisely. 

For example, employees at consulting firms can use RAG search to quickly find research materials for a project without having to dig through folders. 

### 4. Business intelligence 

RAG enhances business intelligence by integrating generative AI summaries with the latest company data. It can retrieve insights from dashboards, reports, and external market data, then generate clear summaries. With historical records, a RAG-powered AI can even perform predictive analysis and make forecasts. 

For instance, a retail business can use RAG to analyze seasonal sales and suggest strategies for better inventory planning. This use case enables executives to see the bigger picture and act proactively based on past events.

### 5. Financial reporting

Finance teams use RAG to automate report generation and ensure accuracy in their figures. RAG models extract data from accounting systems, invoices, transaction logs, and other sources for the reports. 

For example, investment firms can use RAG AI to produce timely reports for stakeholders. 

###  6. Audit assistants

Auditors can use RAG to retrieve various records and highlight anomalies, streamlining a tedious manual process. 

For example, internal audit teams in large corporations can use RAG tools to verify compliance with policies and identify unusual transactions. This saves time while ensuring no critical detail is overlooked.

### 7. Sales enablement 

Sales teams can use RAG to stay informed about customer needs and market trends. RAG can access information such as the latest industry trends, client interactions, competitor activities, or relevant internal limitations to suggest personalized pitches. 

This helps sales teams quickly identify customer pain points and close deals faster.

## Which industries benefit most from RAG?

Multiple industries are turning to RAG AI to boost efficiency. Below are examples:

* **Finance:** In the banking and investment sector, using RAG helps with faster financial reporting, fraud detection, and market analysis.
* **Law:** Legal firms use RAG tools to review contracts, locate precedents, and identify key points for their cases. It can save hours of manual research.
* **Healthcare:** Doctors and medical researchers use RAG-powered LLMs to quickly retrieve patient data or treatment guidelines. It allows them to cut through the noise and presents them with everything they need to make an accurate diagnosis.
* **Technology:** Technology companies use RAG to optimize their workflows. Many tech teams rely on [RAG tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools) to manage vast data sources, support product development, and enhance customer-facing AI tools.
* **Retail:** For retail businesses, RAG helps analyze sales data, track trends, and improve customer support with real-time insights.

## What is agentic RAG for business intelligence?

[Agentic RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/agentic-rag) gives the AI-powered system more autonomy to reason and make decisions using both internal and external data. 

![How Agentic RAG Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_Agentic_RAG_Works_23208c3263.png)

Unlike standard RAG, which only retrieves and responds, agentic RAG can perform tasks. These tasks range from simple ones, such as automatically responding to customer inquiries, to more complex ones, such as analyzing sales data and generating reports independently. 

In terms of business intelligence, agentic RAG helps teams automate deeper analysis and generate insights with minimal human effort. 

### How does agentic RAG enhance business intelligence?

Agentic RAG enables smarter querying and automates complex analytical tasks, allowing AI systems to work more independently. 

Instead of returning textual results alone, agentic RAG can use APIs to perform tasks such as sending emails. This makes it scalable for both large companies and small business startups that need real-time insights. 

Agentic RAG enhances automation across business operations by combining intelligent reasoning with tangible actions.

## What are the common challenges when implementing RAG in business?

While RAG offers excellent value, adopting it in real-world business settings presents a few challenges that require careful planning and strategy:

* **Data privacy:** A significant concern that large businesses face is protecting sensitive information. They must ensure that customer records and internal knowledge stay secure, especially when using external knowledge sources. It is vital that they set clear access rules and use encryption to help maintain data integrity.
* **Integration:** Merging RAG with existing systems can be tricky. It requires aligning databases, APIs, and workflows so that the model retrieves relevant content efficiently. Regular testing and clear metrics help confirm that the integration works as it should.
* **Scalability:** As datasets grow, maintaining speed and accuracy can be difficult. It is advisable to use cloud solutions and augmentation processes to ensure the system stays fast and scalable.
* **Cost:** Setting up and maintaining RAG models can be expensive. Businesses can reduce costs by starting small (that is, focusing on a few key areas) and then scaling gradually as their performance improves.
* **Domain adaptation:** Every industry has its own language and data style. Without fine-tuning, RAG might misinterpret specific terms. Training with domain-specific examples and using AI agents for continuous learning can improve precision.

Now, let’s see the steps involved in implementing RAG for business.

## What are the steps to implement RAG for business?

Implementing RAG is best with a well-thought-out plan that ensures the system aligns with your business goals. Here are the key steps:

1. Start by defining what you want RAG to achieve for your business.
2. Bring together all your key data sources (documents, customer data, and external feeds) and ensure they are well organized and accessible.
3. Choose a reliable RAG tool that supports both data retrieval and language generation.
4. Fine-tune the model with your company’s own data so it understands your specific terms and context.
5. Establish clear rules for deployment, particularly regarding data privacy and system integration.
6. [Evaluate the RAG model's performance](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-evaluation) using straightforward, measurable metrics such as accuracy and response time.
7. Continue improving the system by updating your knowledge sources and refining outputs over time.

### What data sources should be integrated?

For RAG to deliver accurate, valuable results, it needs access to data sources that reflect your business's daily operations. Good sources include CRM systems, which store customer records and interaction histories, and support tickets, which capture real issues and solutions that can train chatbots to respond better. 

Knowledge bases and internal repositories, such as policy documents, manuals, or reports, also play a role in improving the quality of outputs. 

For example, using Meilisearch in a retail business can help index product details, reviews, and FAQs. This makes it easy for RAG to retrieve precise information during customer queries. 

The goal is to ensure that every response the system generates is supported by reliable data derived from actual business activities. Integrating these data sources builds a solid foundation for context-aware communication.

### How to choose a RAG platform

To choose the right RAG platform, you must first understand your business needs and long-term goals:

* A good platform should be scalable, meaning that it can handle more data and users as your company grows. 
* You want a system that integrates smoothly with your existing tools, such as CRMs, databases, or chat applications. 
* Look for platforms that offer strong technical support for your business workflows. 
* If your team is new to AI-driven systems, choose models that provide clear guidance throughout setup and maintenance. 
* Cost is another crucial factor; consider not only the up-front price but also ongoing expenses, such as storage or model updates. 

Whether you have a small startup or a large organization, the right platform should facilitate simple, adaptable implementation. Taking the time to assess these factors ensures your RAG solution delivers consistent performance and value over time.

### What are the best practices for RAG deployment?

To achieve the best results with a RAG system, establish a foundation that ensures clean, secure, and user-friendly data. Here are some practical steps to follow:

* Begin by cleaning the data to remove duplicates or any irrelevant content.
* Train users to create targeted user queries, ensuring they can interact effectively with generative models.
* Use embeddings that capture the proper context. The correct embedding enables the model to retrieve information that truly aligns with the user’s intent.
* Keep an eye on the AI system performance and monitoring. Track how well it handles different queries and identify where updates are required.
* Prioritize security by managing access to sensitive files and maintaining compliance with data protection policies.

[RAGs are different from other types of LLMs](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types); let’s now explore these differences.

## How is RAG different from standalone LLMs in business?

The key difference between RAG and standalone language models is in how they handle information. 

A standalone LLM relies entirely on what it learned during training, which means its responses are limited to older data and may sometimes be inaccurate or out of context. 

RAG enhances reliability by retrieving current information from verified sources before generating a response. Its outputs are more trustworthy for business use. 

You will experience fewer errors and better alignment with real-time business operations using RAG.

## What are the latest trends in business RAG solutions?

Several new trends are shaping how businesses use [RAG techniques](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-techniques) to improve efficiency. Here are some of them:

* **Agentic RAG:** This trend grants RAG systems greater autonomy. They can now perform actions, run analyses, or summarize reports without waiting for human prompts. This automates business workflows, making them more responsive.
* **Multimodal data:** Modern RAG tools are learning to work with more than just text. They can now retrieve and understand images, audio, and videos. This allows companies to use more data types without being limited to textual data alone.
* **Real-time updates:** Businesses want to use AI systems that reflect live changes. Real-time information retrieval ensures that AI responses always include the latest news or company data.
* **Vertical-specific tools:** New RAG platforms are now designed to fit specific industries. These tailored RAG tools understand the domain-specific terms and data types used by businesses in particular sectors. 

## Bringing it all together: the future of RAG for business

RAG is shaping the next phase of business intelligence by connecting training data, logical reasoning, and real-time insight. It is better than the traditional language models because it grounds its answers in verified company information. 

From improving decision-making and customer support to powering automation, RAG is proving to be transformative. 

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for business: Full guide

Understanding hybrid search RAG for better AI answers

Modern GenAI systems are built on a [retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) foundation. 

RAG comes in many forms and varying levels of complexity. Some are simple and easy to use, while others are focused on scaling to the next level. 

In this guide, we’ll cover:

* What ‘naive’ and ‘advanced’ RAG mean, and how they are different from each other.
* The workings of both, from the most basic to the advanced steps.
* Practical insights into the major differences between the two.
* The best time to use them and their applications in real-world use cases.
* The most common benefits and challenges of each.
* The best practices to evolve from naive RAG to advanced RAG, and how you can use Meilisearch to simplify the process

By the end, you’ll know exactly which RAG setup fits your team’s specific situation and performance requirements.

## What is naive RAG?

Naive RAG is the simplest [type of RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types). 

It involves a single retriever fetching relevant documents and passing them to a large language model for generation. It relies on vector similarity search, which in turn relies on embeddings and language models such as OpenAI or Sentence-BERT.

You see naive RAG daily, more than you realize. It’s in prototypes, chatbots, and internal tools designed to optimize latency and simplicity. 

However, it’s not the go-to option for accuracy, unlike advanced RAG. Let’s look at that next.

## What is advanced RAG?

When you want to take RAG to the next level, you arrive at advanced retrieval-augmented generation. It builds on the naive approach by adding more layers of precision and reliability through reranking, query rewriting, and multi-stage retrieval processes. This not only improves the accuracy of the generation but also provides final responses that users enjoy reading.

You can find advanced RAG in production environments where the primary focus is on accuracy and removing hallucinations. This is ideal for specific domains, such as finance or healthcare. 

Now, let’s explore how each RAG system works in practice.

## How does naive RAG work?

Naive RAG follows a simple three-step workflow connecting information retrieval and generation.

![How Naive RAG Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_Naive_RAG_Works_b6dfc9b788.png)

1. **Indexing:** When indexing, the documents are first chunked into smaller sections. These smaller sections are then converted into vector embeddings through language models. Then, these vectors are stored in a [vector database](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-a-vector-database), such as Meilisearch or FAISS.
2. **Retrieval:** Similar to document indexing, a user query is also converted into an embedding. The retriever then finds vectors similar to the query from the database using similarity metrics, such as cosine similarity.
3. **Generation:** For each generation process, the retrieved documents are first linked and fed to a large language model (LLM). From the LLM, a response is generated based on the context provided.

Naive RAG prioritizes speed and simplicity. If you want a basic functionality or RAG deployment, this is the way to go. 

Now, let’s see how advanced RAG works.

## How does advanced RAG work?

Advanced RAG builds upon naive RAG through various optimization layers that enhance retrieval and generation quality.

![How Advanced RAG Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_Advanced_RAG_Works_1c7c6f976d.png)

1. **Pre-retrieval optimization:** Before retrieval even begins, the system rewrites user queries to capture better what the user actually means. This helps in matching domain-specific terminology and providing additional context.
2. **Multi-stage retrieval:** Instead of just one, advanced RAG has multiple retrievers. They pull results from various sources to cover a broader range of information types. The sources can be databases, vector stores, and even APIs.
3. **Post-retrieval reranking and filtering:** The process of reranking serves as an eliminator for the less relevant responses. It uses LLM scoring to deliver the most appropriate answers. 
4. **Auto-merging and context pruning:** Overlapping or repetitive text is merged, and low-value content is removed before generation.
5. **Response generation:** The final, filtered context is passed to the generation model for coherent, grounded answers.

As you can tell, these added layers serve to fine-tune and improve the generated responses to the users’ liking. 

Let’s take a look at the major differences between these two RAG approaches.

## What is the main difference between naive and advanced RAG?

The main difference between naive RAG and advanced RAG is in precision and control. 

Naive RAG has a single retriever loop, whereas advanced RAG includes multiple layers to generate the most accurate responses. 

Naive RAG is the best choice when you want speed and simplicity, while advanced RAG will serve you the best when it comes to optimizing for a highly accurate and reliable RAG pipeline.

![Naive RAG vs Advanced RAG.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/Naive_RAG_vs_Advanced_RAG_92a2a6ca72.png)

Naive RAG is suitable for quick experiments or internal tools, while advanced RAG is built for enterprise-grade deployments that demand the next level of precision and trust.

## What are the benefits of naive RAG?

For teams that are starting out, there is no better starting point than naive RAG. It can be your first step into experimenting in this domain: 

* **Super simple:** For naive RAG, all you need is a retriever, an embedding model, and a generator. This simplicity makes it ideal for quick deployments or creating a proof of concept.
* **Top-tier speed:** Since there’s minimal pipeline orchestration, the responses from naive RAG are quick and have almost non-existent latency.
* **Easy on the wallet:** Thanks to fewer API calls and pretty much zero reranking layers, it’s budget-friendly.
* **Maintenance isn’t a chore:** Since the architecture is so lightweight, you only need to maintain or tune a limited number of moving parts.
* **Flexible:** The flexibility of naive RAG means it works well in question-answering applications, such as chatbots, where accuracy isn’t a significant issue.

## What are the benefits of advanced RAG?

Advanced RAG provides a detailed level of control that naive RAG could never achieve:

* **A monumental jump in accuracy:** Thanks to extra layers, such as reranking, filtering, and query rewriting, advanced RAG generates responses that meet the user’s needs much better than naive RAG responses.
* **Highly relevant:** Through multi-stage retrieval, advanced RAG ensures that users receive only the most relevant chunks within the desired context. 
* **Scalability on point:** Advanced RAG's modular design was specifically created to support large-scale vector databases and hybrid retrievals. It can handle enterprise workloads with ease.
* **Fewer hallucinations:** Continuous feedback loops and evaluation metrics help improve the quality of responses over time.
* **A ton of flexibility:** Since it handles varied data sources, advanced RAG offers a significant amount of flexibility, allowing it to work without retraining the LLM repeatedly.

In short, advanced RAG is the perfect fit for highly critical AI RAG applications and setups that process complex queries. 

To master RAG and its various types, feel free to [check out our official guide](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/mastering-rag).

## What are the limitations of naive RAG?

Naive RAG’s simplicity makes it easy to start with, but it limits its ability to scale or deliver consistently accurate results over time:

* **Low precision:** Since it retrieves documents only based on similarity scores, there’s a considerable potential for inaccurate responses.
* **Limited recall:** Naive RAG might even miss relevant information entirely because it lacks an element of reranking or query refinement. 
* **Outdated information:** Since retrieval isn’t dynamically refreshed or filtered, responses might include data that’s irrelevant or stale.
* **Room for hallucinations:** The LLM might misinterpret the retrieved information, which could lead to hallucinations.
* **No feedback mechanism:** The absence of evaluation loops or retraining signals results in no improvement over time. 

These issues make naive RAG best suited for experimentation rather than production environments where precision is required.

## What are the limitations of advanced RAG?

Advanced RAG offers scalability and a trust factor, but it comes with inevitable trade-offs.

* **Extremely high complexity:** The many optimization layers increase advanced RAG’s complexity to a point where considerable engineering effort is required to maintain it.
* **It requires resources:** When handling larger pipelines, advanced RAG requires more computing power, memory, and API calls. These costs can add up over time.
* **Risk of overfitting:** Being overly specific limits how well language models can perform across different data types or industries.
* **Harder to evaluate:** To track retrieval precision and hallucination rates, you need to have complex benchmarking setups in place. 

While advanced RAG addresses many of the weaknesses of naive RAG, it requires significant resources to maintain its optimal state.

## When should you use naive RAG?

Naive RAG is the perfect fit if you want to prototype early-stage LLM applications or test prompts. 

Smaller projects, such as chatbots, internal knowledge bases, or proof-of-concept demos, benefit greatly from the speed and simplicity that naive RAG brings. It is also a good fit when data volume is small and latency must stay low, such as in local or offline use cases.

However, naive RAG’s lightweight design means you have to give up on precision and scalability. 

## When should you use advanced RAG?

Are you working in a domain where there’s simply no compromise on precision and accuracy? Then, advanced RAG is your choice. 

It’s ideal for enterprise-grade systems, customer-facing chatbots, and domain-specific assistants. It’s a particularly good fit for medical knowledge platforms or legal research tools. It’s also perfect for large datasets with hybrid retrieval systems.

## What are common applications of naive RAG?

Naive RAG is used where speed and simplicity are more important than any other factor. Let’s see a few typical applications below:

* **FAQ chatbots:** In FAQ chatbots, naive RAG helps generate quick responses from internal documents without requiring complex reasoning.
* **Internal search tools:** Naive RAG helps teams access relevant snippets from wikis, manuals, or emails using simple embeddings. 
* **Knowledge retrieval systems:** Naive RAG is used in systems that require the quick fetching of facts or short answers from a predefined dataset. 
* **Prototype assistants:** Another everyday use of naive RAG is in prototype assistants that developers like to test before scaling with different RAG models.
* **Customer support portals:** Naive RAG helps surface the most relevant articles or troubleshooting guides without requiring full-text generation.

## What are common applications of advanced RAG?

For high-powered systems that thrive on high accuracy and minimal hallucinations, advanced RAG is the go-to choice: 

* **Enterprise chatbots:** Advanced RAG is used in enterprise chatbots that provide well-researched answers across departments by combining various internal knowledge bases.
* **Legal and compliance assistants:** You’ll find advanced RAG in legal and compliance assistants, where you need accurate retrieval or citation of verified information.
* **Medical research tools:** The medical field can’t compromise on accuracy. Advanced RAG is used to provide insights from clinical studies in medical datasets. 
* **Customer support automation:** Advanced RAG is also used to combine semantic search and retrieval with LLM reasoning to provide detailed responses in customer support.
* **AI research assistants:** Advanced RAG supports data scientists and engineers, especially when they handle repositories and experimental data.

All in all, when the environment is complex or data-heavy and regulated, the advanced RAG framework provides the relevant accuracy and transparency that’s needed.

## How does naive RAG compare to GraphRAG?

The main difference between naive RAG and GraphRAG is that naive RAG treats documents as isolated chunks for retrieval purposes. 

[GraphRAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/graph-rag), on the other hand, connects various entities and relationships within a specific context to provide deeper reasoning and traceability. 

![Naive RAG vs GraphRAG.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/Naive_RAG_vs_Graph_RAG_3fe0dc19be.png)

Now, we’ll move to some examples of advanced RAG techniques.

## Examples of advanced RAG techniques

Advanced RAG has its own set of layers and retrieval techniques that help improve the accuracy and precision of responses. 

Many of these techniques are outlined in our in-depth article on [advanced RAG techniques](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-techniques):

* **Dynamic chunking:** In this process, the documents are broken into contextually coherent pieces rather than fixed blocks. This provides a significant improvement in retrieval quality, eliminating unnecessary noise.
* **Query rewriting:** This refers to the process of rewriting user input before search, so that the retriever surfaces better-matched context. It can be through synonyms, clarification, or similar. 
* **Reranking and filtering:** After the initial retrieval, results are rescored and low-value items are removed. The only way forward is a high-quality response.
* **Hybrid retrieval:** This type of retrieval gives you broader recall and increased precision, which is particularly useful for mixed-type data.
* **Feedback loops and context distillation:** In naive RAG, there are no feedback loops. In advanced RAG, however, the system logs user outcomes and refines chunks over time to improve response accuracy.

Now, we’ll see how you can evaluate naive and advanced RAG setups.

## How to evaluate naive vs. advanced RAG

To evaluate each of these systems, consider how they perform in terms of accuracy, answer quality, and latency. 

Naive RAG generally scores high on speed and simplicity, whereas advanced RAG prioritizes factual grounding and user trust through re-ranking and improved retrieval layers.

For a detailed explanation of evaluation frameworks and metrics, explore our [RAG evaluation guide](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-evaluation), which breaks down structured methods to assess retrieval and generation quality.

Next, we’ll look at best practices for upgrading from naive to advanced RAG.

## What are the best practices for moving from naive to advanced RAG?

So, how can you methodically transition from a naive RAG to an advanced RAG system? It’s all about maintaining structure without overcomplicating the stack. 

You can start with the following steps:

1. **Audit your current pipeline:** Identify all latency or accuracy issues before adding a layer of complexity. 
2. **Adopt modular upgrades:** Add updates one step at a time. For instance, start with query rewriting, then reranking, and then hybrid retrieval. Track the progress at each step.
3. **Implement continuous evaluation:** Ensure that you keep track of hallucination rates, accuracy, and latency. 
4. **Optimize data and chunking:** Refine document splitting and embedding quality. 
5. **Automate feedback loops:** Leverage user interactions to refine retrieval scoring and query understanding algorithms.

Meilisearch is the perfect companion for you in this transition process. It helps by offering an OpenAI-compatible <code>/chat</code>** **API that bundles query understanding, structured retrieval, and generation in one call. This helps avoid heavy infrastructure. 

You can also view our picks for the best [RAG tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools) on the official page.

## Choosing the right approach in the naive RAG vs. advanced RAG journey

Naive RAG is for teams that are just starting with experimentation and want to test the RAG waters before moving to full-scale deployments. 

Advanced RAG serves better in accuracy-critical domains and large-scale deployments. 

The right choice depends on your goals. If your focus is on testing and agility, start with a naive approach. If your product requires precision, resilience, and scalability, consider adopting advanced RAG techniques.

Naive RAG vs. advanced RAG: What are the differences?

This is the third in our series on practical RAG with Meilisearch. In [post #1](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/mastering-rag), we explained how hybrid retrieval (lexical + semantic) boosts both recall and precision so your results are actually the right ones. In [post #2](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-with-meilisearch), we walked through the full RAG pipeline: query refinement → retrieval → generation, and why keeping those pieces integrated keeps latency low and the system simple.

In this post, we focus on how teams actually ship. We’ll look at three patterns that show up over and over in real products: **R**etrieval, **A**nswers, and **G**rowth, and illustrate each with concrete use cases from teams using Meilisearch today.

## (R)etrieval: making the search bar fast, precise, and dependable

Shoppers don’t want an essay about sneakers; they want the right product card with a clean **'Add to cart' button**. In a commercial flow, generation is optional, but **retrieval quality** is everything. That’s the heart of the revenue pattern: make rank #1 correct, obvious, and fast, so the next click is a purchase, and not a string of revised queries.

![retrieve-find-results-fast.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/retrieve_find_results_fast_84dd0e3314.png "Retrieve: Find results fast and accurately")

You can see this play out at [**Bookshop.org**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/bookshop-increases-search-based-purchases), where better retrieval directly translates into more purchases from search, increasing from 14% of searches leading to a purchase to 20%, a **43%** relative lift. That’s the sort of metric you feel in the revenue graph, and it came from relevance, not more copy. 

[**Minipouce**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/minipouce-top-grade-customer-experience) showcases the “great on day one” angle: solid defaults, typo tolerance, and intuitive facets produce results that feel right without weeks of tuning. 

And for teams outside classic retail, [**Qogita**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/qogita-simplifies-b2b-trade) (B2B marketplace) and [**HitPay**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/hitpay-streamlines-search) (fintech/commerce) exhibit the same retrieval-first pattern, dropping into very different surfaces: fast to set up, easy to operate, and friendly to lean teams.

What makes this work is a short, disciplined loop: hybrid ranking to catch both exact matches (“Air Max 270 black 42”) and intent phrasing (“black Nike runners size 9”), facets that narrow instantly, and a UI that respects the action. Keep an eye on zero-results queries, measure search→purchase conversion, and treat synonyms/typos as first-class relevance features. When intent is commercial, **R > G**: retrieval first, retrieval last.

## (A)nswers (retrieval + generation): one reliable answer beats ten links

Internal questions are scavenger hunts across policies, procedures, docs, tickets, and code. Your teammate doesn’t want ten blue links; they want a short, sourced answer they can act on. That’s where **retrieval + generation** shines: retrieval assembles the right building blocks; generation assembles them into a trustworthy and concise answer.

![answer-produce-accurate-answers.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/answer_produce_accurate_answers_c4524820d2.png "Answer: Produce accurate answers synthesizing the searched results.")

In practice, [**Louis Vuitton**](https://eu.louisvuitton.com/eng-e1/homepage) is a clear example: store associates get consistent, fast answers to policy and product questions across locations. The value isn’t that an LLM can chat – it’s that retrieval surfaces current, canonical guidance, and generation condenses it into steps a person can follow. 

For developer productivity, [**Symfony**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/symfonys-solution-for-documentation-search) shows what low-latency, well-scoped search looks like at scale: sub-10 ms responses over **85,000+** docs across **30** versions help engineers land on the exact class, command, or procedure they need. At [**OCTO Technology**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/meilisearch-is-a-partner-of-choice-for-octo), the same approach operates as a dependable, production-ready solution in client environments where reliability and maintainability are crucial.

The craft is in the details: make retrieval source-aware (favor canonical and current, down-rank duplicates and stale pages), retrieve **snippets** instead of whole pages so the model stays on a short leash, and use a prompt that’s opinionated about behavior, yet can synthesize briefly, cite every claim, include steps or a code block when useful, and say “no evidence found” instead of guessing. A tiny feedback loop (“useful / missing / outdated”) helps you fix the source, not just the surface.

## (G)rowth (infrastructure): scale you don’t have to think about

Most RAG stories focus on search and answers. That’s great, until the demo grows up. The catalog doubles, traffic spikes on a Tuesday, someone adds three new locales, and suddenly your tidy prototype is juggling a keyword engine, a vector store, and a re-ranker stitched together with custom middleware. Queries get slow, dashboards get noisy, and your on-call starts carrying two laptops.

![grow-scale-effortlessly.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/grow_scale_effortlessly_0f7c99ddde.png "Grow: Scale effortlessly as the data and customer base grow")

Some things are meant to be boring, and **scaling** should be one of them. Instead of an ever-changing stack where you tweak three services every time the user base grows, **Meilisearch offers one hybrid path** that stays fast as you add data, users, and languages. **One engine and one request handle both lexical precision and semantic recall.** No service hopping, fewer moving parts, and fewer surprises. As the client, you focus on content and UX, and we focus on the plumbing.

That’s the experience we aim for with Meilisearch. Index growth feels like adding shelves, not rebuilding the warehouse. Versioned indexes and safe schema changes turn “we need a new attribute” into a routine deployment. Language-aware analyzers, combined with embeddings, handle phrasing differences without a meeting. Monitoring covers what actually matters: latency *and* quality. That way you can spot recall/precision drift before users do. And vectors don’t have to eat your budget: compact embeddings, ANN indexes, and only storing what moves relevance keep costs sensible.

You can see this pattern in the wild. **CarbonGraph** moved from a standalone vector setup and found that adding embeddings inside a hybrid engine was straightforward, meaning no extra choreography was required. 

[**Hugging Face**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/hugging-face-democratizes-ai) is the stress test: discovery keeps working across **2.2M model cards**, **500k datasets**, and **60k demos** without turning every query into a science project. 

And for “hard-mode” content, [**TutKit**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/tutkit-multilingual-learning-at-scale) serves **15,000+** items in **26 languages**, while [**Bildhistoria**](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/powering-bildhistoria-discovery) keeps **90,000+** richly annotated historical images findable and fast. Different shapes of data, the same quiet promise: it scales, and you barely notice.

## Ready, Aim, Go!

RAG isn’t one architecture; it’s a set of patterns you can plug in and ship. With Meilisearch, you get three practical pillars to build on: **Retrieve**, **Answer**, and **Grow**. **Retrieve** for quick discovery. **Answer** for concise, sourced guidance. **Grow** for speed and stability at scale. Start where you are, keep one path, and keep iterating.

Retrieve and gain: Three RAG use-case patterns you can ship today

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming better at handling larger context windows. But does that mean retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is obsolete? Not quite. 

Here’s a quick look at what this guide covers:

* How RAG delivers grounded and user-friendly responses through retrieval and generation. 
* The hype surrounding long-context LLM models like Gemini 1.5 Pro or GPT-4.1, which can process thousands of tokens simultaneously.
* The major difference between RAG and long-context as well as the gap between them.
* When to use RAG and long-context LLMs, and what makes one better than the other in different situations. 
* A look at the pros and cons of each, and whether there is a need to use both together.
* How both RAG and long-context LLMs perform in real-world use cases, from AI agents to enterprise knowledge bases.

Let’s find out which approach gives you better, more grounded responses while incurring minimal costs.

## What is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)?

[Retrieval-augmented generation](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) connects information retrieval with LLMs to generate accurate responses. How? By searching external knowledge bases or vector bases for relevant documents. 

RAG provides an LLM with retrieved chunks of external data, providing relevant context and helping it produce the response the user is looking for. 

As a result, RAG reduces the likelihood of AI hallucinations. It’s used in [AI agents](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/agentic-rag) and real-time workflows that depend on external data.

Next, let’s take a look at how long-context LLMs handle larger context windows without retrieval.

## What is a long-context LLM?

A long-context LLM, as the name suggests, is a large language model specifically designed to handle a much larger context window size than the standard models. The difference is quite staggering, as it can sometimes process even millions of tokens without relying on retrieval.

Modern examples include GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4 Opus, and Llama 4 Maverick. They can read entire reports, research papers, or knowledge bases at once, making them ideal for summarization, deep reasoning tasks, and extended document analysis.

Next, let’s compare how these long-context models differ from RAG.

## How does RAG differ from long-context LLMs?

The basic difference you need to understand between RAG and long-context LLMs is that they handle context differently. 

RAG retrieves relevant information from external sources before generation. Long-context LLMs, on the other hand, process all input within a single, long-context window. 

![RAG vs Long-Context LLMs.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/RAG_vs_Long_Context_LL_Ms_cbc72da795.png)

While accuracy and scalability are goals for both approaches, the methods used to achieve them differ. 

If you’re exploring different architectures, our post on [RAG types](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types) breaks down each variant with examples. 

Now, let’s see when using one of these is better than the other.

## When should you use RAG over long-context LLMs?

Retrieval-augmented generation is the perfect match when your app relies on external knowledge or dynamic datasets. If you need real-time retrieval and scalability, you can’t go wrong with RAG.

RAG handles changing knowledge bases and keeps latency predictable, minimizing the required number of tokens per query. 

It’s cost-effective and enables domain-specific optimization as well as granular access control for transparent audit trails. 

## When are long-context LLMs a better choice?

The best time to use long-context LLMs is when your data fits inside a single large context window and doesn’t change often. Summarization, reasoning, technical reports, understanding transcripts; they do it all. 

The newer models, such as GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4 Opus, and Llama 4 Maverick, push context window sizes past a million tokens and easily handle complex cross-document reasoning. Additionally, these models can handle entire datasets directly, eliminating the need for retrieval pipelines.

As amazing as that sounds, it comes with a significant computational cost. The latency also goes up for larger inputs. 

In short, for static knowledge bases, more extended context exploration, or quick experimentation, long-context LLMs are often the more practical path.

## What are the main advantages of RAG?

RAG gives you all the control and flexibility you need to build faster and minimize costs when developing your system. 

Let’s see what makes RAG special:

1. **Efficient use of resources:** By retrieving only relevant documents, RAG keeps the number of tokens small, reduces costs, and speeds up each query.
2. **Speed:** Thanks to the use of vector bases and embedding models in the retrieval process, the speed of RAG systems is unmatched.
3. **Flexibility and adaptability:** RAG easily integrates with various knowledge bases, requiring no fine-tuning.
4. **Full transparency:** Every answer can point back to its retrieved chunks, so it can easily be traced while maintaining user trust.

Want to see how teams optimize performance? Check out our official guide on [RAG tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools).

## What are the main advantages of long-context LLMs?

Long-context LLMs are by far the best option when you need the system to handle large inputs while retaining the context. 

Let’s take a deeper look at their pros:

1. **Thorough understanding:** These models process entire datasets or documents in a single pass, ensuring minimal fragmentation and preserving the meaning.
2. **Exhaustive reasoning:** Long-context LLMs shine in reasoning tasks and can connect ideas spread across long sequences for stronger logical flow.
3. **Simplicity:** There’s no need for external RAG pipelines or vector databases. Just input your text and generate.

Now, it’s time to see the limitations of both RAG and long-context LLMs.

## What are the limitations of RAG?

RAG is the go-to option for accuracy and control, but that doesn’t mean it comes without challenges. Let’s look at some below:

1. **Retrieval is not 100% accurate:** You may sometimes receive poor output quality due to inadequate chunking and embedding models.
2. **Costly maintenance:** Keeping indexes fresh requires ongoing updates to datasets and managing data pipelines. None of this is free or easy.
3. **Experienced prompt engineering skills needed:** RAG depends on well-structured prompts to merge retrieved chunks without confusing the LLM.
4. **Latency changes too easily:** Each retrieval step adds milliseconds to the response time. When you estimate this at scale, it adds up to a significant amount of latency. 

These factors make RAG more complex to deploy and maintain than long-context LLMs, which is why small teams tend to avoid it.

## What are the limitations of long-context LLMs?

Let’s now explore the key drawbacks to long-context LLMs:

1. **Excessive resource use:** When you want to process millions of tokens, you need more computational resources.
2. **Scaling isn’t easy:** It’s not straightforward to scale long-context LLMs, as latency and response times increase with added context length.
3. **Lost context:** You can lose important details, especially in extremely long inputs or mixed datasets.
4. **Data security:** The larger the prompt, the greater the risk of prompt injection, which can lead to data leakage and compromise enterprise security.

Even advanced models face these issues when pushed to their context window size limits.

Next, we’ll examine how both methods perform using real-world benchmarks.

## How do RAG and long-context LLMs perform on benchmarks?

Numerous qualified studies offer nuanced insights into how each approach performs. 

Let’s look at some of the most recent papers that discuss this in detail.

[‘Retrieval Augmented Generation or Long-Context LLMs? A Comprehensive Study and Hybrid Approach’](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16833) (Li et al., 2024) found that long‐context LLMs consistently outperformed RAG when ample resources were available, but RAG was undoubtedly far more cost-efficient.

Another study, [‘LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs – No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing’](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09977) (Li et al., 2025), observed that there was no one-size-fits-all solution. The choice ultimately depends on the model size, task type, and other factors surrounding context length and retrieval quality.

Long-context models shine for long, static documents. On the other hand, RAG performs better when datasets are dynamic or diverse. 

## How do RAG and long-context LLMs impact costs?

It’s no secret that RAG offers lower overall costs for setup, while long-context LLMs incur a higher token and infrastructure cost at scale: 

* **Unique setup cost:** With RAG, the focus is on indexing, embedding, and retrieval. For LLMs, the focus is on a premium API or GPUs that support large context windows. 
* **Inference costs:** The inference cost for RAG is much lower since it only sends relevant chunks to the LLM. This way, it minimizes the token cost and usage. On the other hand, LLMs that are processing 200k+ tokens per request might even cost up to $20 per call. 
* **Scaling and maintenance costs:** RAG pipelines require ongoing index upkeep and retrieval tuning, but base LLM token consumption stays low. Long-context solutions scale poorly with more users or larger documents because each call incurs increased costs and latency.
* **Operational charges to consider:** Enterprises with strict cost or latency targets often choose RAG since it better suits their needs. For long-context LLMs, hidden costs like GPU usage, memory capacity, and slower responses become an uninvited guest that you don’t enjoy dealing with.

## What are real-world use cases for RAG?

RAG is ideal for domains that deal with rapidly changing contexts. These include:

1. **Enterprise knowledge systems:** Companies use RAG to consolidate all their internal data from wikis, emails, and CRMs into a unified knowledge base. AI assistants can then use this knowledge base to deliver relevant answers.
2. **Intelligent search engines:** RAG serves as the backbone for intelligent search engines. Thanks to vector databases and [hybrid retrieval](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/hybrid-search), manual lookup time can be significantly reduced.
3. **Dynamic document management:** In fast-moving domains such as finance or healthcare, RAG enables real-time updates without requiring retraining of the AI model. This way, the output always reflects the latest updates.

## What are real-world use cases for long-context LLMs?

Long-context LLMs excel at handling tasks that require large inputs: 

1. **Summarization and analysis:** Models can process entire reports, transcripts, or books. They provide all the information you need from these sources, whether summaries, transcripts, or answers to questions that require reasoning.
2. **Legal and compliance review:** Long-context LLMs are a go-to choice for enterprises that need to review legal contracts in their entirety. They also help in flagging inaccurate info and comparing clauses without losing context.
3. **Academic and technical research:** Long-context systems can explore long datasets, scientific papers, or arXiv collections to identify relevant information and trends across different fields.

It’s now time to explain why LLMs’ growing capabilities are starting to challenge traditional RAG pipelines.

## Why are long-context LLMs challenging traditional RAG pipelines?

All these recent advances in context window size are reshaping how developers think about retrieval. 

Models that can handle over a million tokens reduce reliance on RAG pipelines and vector databases. For smaller or static datasets, long-context LLMs provide faster and simpler results without requiring any retrieval infrastructure. 

However, RAG remains undefeated when it comes to dynamic or real-time data retrieval, offering both data freshness and scalability.

Let’s see how to choose between these two approaches effectively.

## How to choose between RAG and long-context LLMs?

Choosing between RAG and long-context LLMs depends on your data volume, update frequency, and performance goals. Each approach can meet a distinct need:

1. **Project scope:** If the project is small or static, such as a policy chat or document summary, the long-context models are way easier to deploy. For larger projects that need real and ongoing reasoning, RAG is what you want.
2. **Data type and freshness:** If your system relies on constantly changing or real-time content (such as support tickets, logs, or news) RAG ensures the results remain current and up-to-date. 
3. **Scalability and cost:** RAG minimizes token usage, so it’s more cost-effective for enterprise-scale workflows. Long-context LLMs consume more tokens as the context length increases, resulting in increased latency and computational resources.
4. **Compliance and control:** When there can be no compromise with audit trails and explainability, such as in healthcare or finance, RAG’s indexed architecture provides audit-ready outputs. 

In short, RAG suits high-volume, dynamic ecosystems, while long-context LLMs excel in reasoning-intensive domains.

## How does retrieval work in RAG vs. long-context LLMs?

In RAG, retrieval happens before the model generates a reply. A retriever searches your knowledge base to find the most relevant documents, then passes the retrieved information to the large language model for response generation.

Tools like Meilisearch make this step even faster and production-ready. Meilisearch indexes content and performs hybrid retrieval (keyword + vector) with built-in filters, scoring, and reranking. This gives grounded and citable snippets that aren’t just accurate but also easy to track. It’s transparent and quick to update or scale through Meilisearch’s simple <code>/chat</code> API.

Long-context LLMs have no retrieval step at all. They rely entirely on what’s packed inside the prompt. 

While this works for short, static data, it becomes costly and less fresh as context windows grow. Additionally, there’s no automatic refresh or audit trails, so it is impossible to trace the origin of the response.

## Can RAG and long-context LLMs be combined?

Yes, and it’s often the best of both worlds. Hybrid setups use RAG to fetch relevant documents from a knowledge base, then feed them into a long-context LLM. Then comes the reasoning across the entire input combined.

This hybrid approach strikes the perfect balance between recall and reasoning. RAG ensures the prompts are lean and cost-effective, while the long-context LLMs handle the analysis and reasoning the user requires.

Meilisearch handles the retrieval layer in such systems: indexing, filtering, and returning grounded, high-quality snippets before the model processes them.

If you’re into experimenting with model correction or hybrid routing, explore [our guide on corrective RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/corrective-rag) for practical strategies.

## Bringing it together: choosing between RAG and long-context LLMs

Both RAG and long-context LLMs push the limits of how large language models use data, but their goals differ significantly from one another. 

RAG is all about accuracy and efficiency, but long-context LLMs excel in reasoning and retaining context. 

The best foundation you can build for any system is to combine both of them.

RAG vs. long-context LLMs: A side-by-side comparison

RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) indexing determines how well an AI system grounds its answers in relevant information. It enables the system to quickly locate relevant documents for a search query. 

Developing RAG indexing involves building a pipeline with the following steps: 

* Data collection 
* Meaningful chunking
* Metadata addition 
* Embedding
* Storage in a vector index

Good indexing reduces AI hallucinations and improves relevance across both structured and unstructured data.

RAG indexing strategies, such as hybrid, hierarchical, domain-specific, and graph-based, adapt to the structure of the knowledge base and the retrieval system's goals.

Issues caused by scale, chunk size, and metadata quality can be handled with clean data, consistent embeddings, and regular updates.

Factors such as speed, cost, integration needs, and dataset size are important considerations when selecting a database.

RAG indexing differs from keyword search by using embeddings rather than exact term matches.

Future RAG developments are moving toward hybrid retrieval methods, graph-enhanced approaches, and RAPTOR-style hierarchical indexing.

## What is RAG indexing?

RAG indexing is the process by which a [RAG system](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) organizes and prepares data so that, when prompted by a user query, the correct information can be easily retrieved. 

It takes the documents, chunks them into smaller pieces, creates vector representations of the chunks, and stores them in a special index so the system can quickly find them when needed. 

Without indexing, a RAG system would not know how to connect a user’s question to the relevant context. The index serves as a map of the knowledge base, enabling the retriever to quickly locate the most relevant text without having to search the entire knowledge base. 

That retrieved information is then passed to the LLM (large language model) to generate an appropriate answer to the query.

## How does RAG indexing work?

RAG indexing organizes the source data so that the RAG system can quickly find and return the most relevant information chunk. It converts raw documents into searchable vector embeddings and stores them in a vector database, enabling fast similarity searches. 

![How RAG Indexing Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_RAG_Indexing_Works_2b7e28b7a3.png)

Here are the main stages of RAG indexing:

1. **Data collection:** RAG indexing begins by collecting data from various sources. These can be external PDFs, blog articles, an FAQ spreadsheet, etc. 
2. **Cleaning the text:** Next, the collected data is processed. Data cleaning may involve removing headers, fixing unparseable symbols, removing extra spaces, and so on. 
3. **Document chunking:** Long documents are typically split into smaller chunks to ensure the text is within the LLM’s context window. The chunks should be large enough to retain context but small enough to be processed efficiently. For instance, instead of treating a 40-page policy manual as one giant block of text, you can break it into hundreds of smaller sections.
4. **Tagging with metadata:** Next, each chunk is tagged with metadata for quick filtering. The metadata are relevant fields such as title, data source, topic, category, or date. For example, tagging a chunk from a refund policy document with ‘topic: refunds' allows the system to instantly find it when a user asks a related question.
5. **Embedding:** The chunks are then converted into [vector embeddings](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-are-vector-embeddings) to ensure similar chunks are placed close to each other. For example, we can expect chunks on ‘refund rules’ and ‘return policy’ to be close because they would share similar vectors.
6. **Vector storage:** Finally, these vectors and their metadata tags are stored in a [vector database](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-a-vector-database). Some common vector databases are Pinecone, Milvus, FAISS, and Weaviate.

## Why is indexing important in RAG?

RAG indexing makes RAG systems more accurate by organizing information so the LLM can quickly find and use the right content when answering a question. 

Here are some of its benefits:

* **Speed:** Without indexing, the system would have to scan every document in its entirety whenever someone asks a question. Indexing stores precomputed embeddings, so the system can instantly search and retrieve relevant chunks without having to search from scratch.
* **Relevance:** Because chunks are embedded and tagged with metadata, the algorithm can match a user’s query to the most meaningful pieces of text. This precise retrieval enhances the relevance of answers.
* **Accuracy:** Indexing preserves context and meaning. Since the retrieval step is cleaner and more targeted, the final answer generated is better grounded in correct information.
* **Scalability:** Vector databases and indexing techniques can elegantly handle large data volumes. Therefore, it is possible to update or expand the knowledge base over time without affecting the RAG system's performance. 

## What are the main RAG indexing strategies?

Different indexing strategies fit different [types of RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types). Picking the right one mainly depends on the content you want to search through. 

Your indexing strategy can also impact the relevance and performance of the RAG. 

Here are several common RAG indexing strategies and when you would use them:

### 1. Hierarchical indexing

Hierarchical indexing involves organizing content at multiple levels. The text resource is broken down from a document into sections, then paragraphs, and finally chunks. This strategy respects a document's structure and does not randomly create chunks. 

For example, a legal contract might first be identified by section (e.g., ‘Termination Clause’) then by the exact paragraph that answers the user query. 

You can use this technique when your documents, such as manuals or textbooks, are long and logically organized. It reduces noise, improves relevance, and allows the retriever to first narrow down the section before searching in-depth.


### 2. Hybrid indexing

Hybrid indexing combines keyword-based search (e.g., BM25) with vector search, similar to [hybrid search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/hybrid-search). The AI system uses both approaches to improve its search accuracy. 

For example, when searching for ‘how to fix my damaged electric kettle,’ a keyword search identifies documents containing those exact terms. A vector search retrieves related content to help fix damaged electrical appliances. 

This strategy is ideal when you want precision and coverage. It is also useful when migrating from classic search tools to [RAG tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools) without losing keyword search performance.

### 3. Time-based Indexing

Time-based indexing is used to keep track of information that changes over time. Each document or section is stored with a date label, so the AI system knows which are the most recent. 

This strategy is useful for materials that are frequently updated, such as financial reports, company guidelines, or news articles. 

### 4. Multi-representation indexing

Multi-representation indexing stores multiple vector embeddings for the same piece of text within a single retrieval system. Each embedding focuses on a different aspect of the content. One might capture the overall idea, another might emphasize technical language. 

When a user types a search query, it is processed across all versions. 

This method works well in areas where information can be interpreted in several ways. It is also useful when precision is essential and the language used in your documents is specialized.

### 5. Domain indexing

Domain indexing is designed to match the terminology of a particular field. For example, in medical data, the system might use drug names or symptom categories to label chunks. In software documentation, the index could be organized by API endpoints or code use cases. 

This approach works best when your material follows clear patterns and uses consistent terms. 

It improves search relevance because the index is built around how professionals in that field naturally search for information, rather than treating all text the same.


### 6. Graph-enhanced indexing

Graph-enhanced indexing is a strategy that links text chunks (called nodes) using relationships (called edges). Nodes could include topics, categories, citations, and related details. Graphs allow you to quickly see how multiple chunks are connected. 

Use this strategy in situations when relationships are more important than similarity. It is also ideal for complex domains, such as legal matters or academic research, that involve interconnected concepts.

## What are common challenges in RAG indexing?

RAG indexing involves choices that affect speed, accuracy, and long-term maintenance. 

Here are some common challenges and how you can overcome them:

* **Handling large datasets:** When you are working with thousands of documents (or millions of chunks) indexing and searching can be incredibly slow. Storage costs also go up. A good solution would be to use sharding, compress embeddings, or remove low-value content rather than indexing everything.
* **Picking the right chunk size:** Chunks that are too long can provide the wrong context, and chunks that are too short can lose their meaning. To find the right balance, test with different token lengths (e.g., 200, 400, 600) and evaluate their retrieval quality before deciding on a chunk size.
* **Keeping embeddings consistent:** If you change the embedding model, older vectors may no longer match the new ones. That can lead to bad retrieval. To avoid this, version your embeddings and re-embed only affected documents when the model changes.
* **Stress in managing metadata:** Messy or inconsistent metadata makes filtering useless. You can fix this by defining an explicit schema (e.g., source, date, format, or access level) from the start and enforcing it during ingestion.

## What are the best practices for RAG indexing pipelines?

The quality of your chunks, embeddings, and metadata directly shapes what the AI model can find and use. Here are some best practices for building and maintaining RAG indexing workflows:

* **Always start with clean and meaningful data:** Never dump everything into the index. Remove duplicates and filter out low-value text, such as headers, navigation menus, or disclaimers. Cleaner input means cleaner retrieval and fewer irrelevant matches later.
* **Chunk by meaning, not by fixed length:** Instead of automatically slicing text every 300 tokens, break it around natural boundaries. This includes headings, paragraphs, bullet lists, or API endpoints. It keeps context intact and reduces confusion during retrieval.
* **Keep embeddings and models aligned:** If you update your embedding model or retriever, do not leave the index behind. Re-embed over time or version your vectors so that the old and new chunks stay compatible.
* **Always add metadata:** Good tags make filtering more powerful. Try adding tags such as source, document type, date, section, or access level. This helps the system narrow results quickly and stay grounded in the proper context.
* **Use smart retrieval tricks:** Hybrid search (combining keywords and vectors), light reranking, and query rewriting for typos boost recall without flooding the results with junk.
* **Monitor and refresh the index:** Always track retrieval quality, stale documents, and storage bloat. In addition, replace outdated content and reduce noise instead of letting the index grow unchecked.

### How Meilisearch helps

Meilisearch supports vector search and hybrid querying, which makes it a good fit for RAG indexing pipelines. You can store your text chunks and their embeddings directly in the index, instead of using a separate vector database. That means your indexing step can include both chunking and attaching embeddings.

Meilisearch also lets you filter by metadata such as source, tags, or date, which keeps retrieval grounded and avoids random matches. 

Since Meilisearch handles both semantic search and keyword search, you can combine exact terms with vector similarity. This is perfect when your users mix natural phrasing with domain-specific words.

Another bonus is speed! Indexing is fast, and updating entries doesn’t require a complete rebuild. That helps when documents change or you need to refresh embeddings. In a RAG setup, Meilisearch acts as a searchable store for meaning and structure without overcomplicating the pipeline.

## When should you update a RAG index?

You should update the RAG index whenever the data, documents, or the embedding model change in a way that could affect retrieval quality.

Suppose you add new documents, update policies, change pricing, publish fresh blog posts, or remove outdated material. The index needs to be refreshed so the AI system does not return inaccurate answers. 

The same applies if the embedding model gets upgraded. Old vectors will not match new ones, so re-embedding is needed. 

In fast-changing domains, updates should be scheduled daily or weekly. Monthly or incremental updates may be enough for slower-moving content. 

A good rule of thumb is that if a human wants the new information reflected in the answers, the index should be updated.

## How can you evaluate RAG indexing performance?

You can assess RAG indexing by measuring how fast the system retrieves results, how relevant they are, and whether users find the answers helpful. 

* **Speed:** Slow searches usually indicate a poorly structured index. 
* **Semantic accuracy:** A good question to ask here is, “Are the top chunks related to the query, or just loosely similar?” You can answer this with small human-reviewed samples or automated relevance checks. If you are working with structured data (such as product tables or policy fields) and unstructured data (such as PDFs or help articles), make sure your index handles both consistently.
* **User satisfaction:** Track follow-up questions, unanswered queries, and user feedback to identify areas for improvement. For more structured testing, you can use evaluation tools or custom scripts that measure how often your system retrieves the correct results. If retrieval feels slow or unreliable, your indexing pipeline probably needs fine-tuning, better chunking strategies, or fresher embeddings.

## What are the most popular vector stores for RAG indexing?

Some of the most popular vector stores (or vector-backed retrievers) used in RAG pipelines are Meilisearch (with its vector support), Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, Milvus, Qdrant, and FAISS (or pgvector).

* **Meilisearch:** Though not a traditional vector database, you can use it as a vector-backed retriever by storing embeddings alongside documents. It is excellent when you want a unified search layer (both keyword and vector) without managing a separate vector store. Choose Meilisearch if your dataset is moderate and you value simplicity and lightweight operations.
* **Pinecone:** Excellent if you do not want to deal with servers or scaling issues. It is fully managed, fast, and built for production so that you can focus on retrieval, not infrastructure.
* **Weaviate:** Open source and flexible. It handles hybrid search, filtering, schemas, and even relationships between data. It’s a good fit when you care about meaning and structure, not just raw embeddings.
* **Chroma:** Simple and developer-friendly (built with Python users in mind). It is often used in quick RAG prototypes or smaller RAG applications. If you are experimenting or do not have many vectors, Chroma is a good vector store to use.
* **Milvus:** Milvus is designed for scale. It is open source and works well for storing and querying millions of embeddings across machines. You should use it when performance and control matter more than convenience.

### How to choose a vector DB for RAG indexing

When building a RAG system, your vector database is the backbone of the retrieval system. It needs to store embeddings efficiently and return relevant results quickly. The goal is not just picking a popular tool, but choosing one that fits how you plan to use it:

* **Speed:** If your app needs quick responses, latency matters a lot. A good vector database should return similar results fast, even when working with many embeddings.
* **Scalability:** Your data might start small, but it will not stay that way. The database you choose should handle growth without turning into a maintenance nightmare. If you expect to move from thousands to millions of vectors, choose a tool that can scale horizontally without losing performance.
* **Integration:** You do not want to spend hours wiring things together. Choose a database that works efficiently with your infrastructure. Clean APIs and SDK support make the development process smoother.
* **Cost:** Some options are fully managed and save you time, but they can get pricey as usage grows. Open-source tools are cheaper to run but require more hands-on setup and maintenance. It is all about balancing convenience with budget.

Let’s see how RAG indexing differs from traditional search indexing.

## How does RAG indexing differ from traditional search indexing?

RAG indexing and traditional search indexing seem similar on the surface, but they work in very different ways. 

Traditional indexing is all about keywords. 

RAG indexing, on the other hand, focuses on semantic meaning. Instead of relying solely on words, it uses embeddings to capture context and retrieve relevant chunks based on semantics.

![RAG Indexing vs. Traditional Search Indexing.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/RAG_Indexing_vs_Traditional_Search_Indexing_6b6b7f9ad7.png)

RAG indexing shines when users do not use the exact wording found in the source documents. Examples are conversational queries, domain jargon, or multilingual content. 

Traditional indexing is still a good option when speed, exact matches, and lightweight infrastructure are priorities. Examples are documentation sites or e-commerce search results.

## What are future trends in RAG indexing?

RAG indexing is evolving rapidly, and the next wave involves combining smarter context handling with more effective retrieval strategies:

* **Graph-powered retrieval:** Instead of treating documents as isolated chunks, newer trends link concepts using knowledge graphs. This approach captures relationships across topics and returns more connected answers.
* **RAPTOR-style hierarchical chunking:** Approaches inspired by RAPTOR break content into layers (small chunks are broken for precision, and larger summaries are broken for broader context). This ensures that information retrieval can adapt to the query’s depth.
* **Hybrid retrieval pipelines:** Mixing keyword search, semantic vectors, and metadata filters is becoming the norm. This combination boosts accuracy and speed without relying on a single retrieval process.

## Index smarter, answer sharper

Indexing is a critical component of a good RAG system. When the index is well-chunked and backed by good embeddings, your model will efficiently retrieve the correct information.

However, a smart index is not something you set and forget. As new content springs up, the index should evolve too. Even minor improvements (such as better metadata, refreshed embeddings, or reorganized chunks) can noticeably improve the retrieval accuracy. 

At the end of the day, sharper answers do not come from luck or bigger models. They come from indexing that is done with intent.  

RAG indexing: Structure and evaluate for grounded LLM answers

Semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are crucial for how today's AI systems handle information and find relevant answers to user queries. 

Think of it this way: semantic search is all about ranking information based on what it means, while RAG takes it further by actively retrieving knowledge to provide the answers users need. 

In this article, we're going to explore:

* What semantic search and RAG are and how they work.
* The contrast between their capabilities.
* The potential for overlap and collaboration, as well as whether or not they can work without each other.
* How to figure out when semantic search is enough, when RAG is essential, and when combining them gives you the best results.
* The pros, cons, and limitations that come with both so that you can evaluate them properly.

By the time you're done, you'll have a clear framework for choosing the best approach for your data and users. 

Ready? Let’s get into it.

## What is semantic search?

[Semantic search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/semantic-search) is a technique that helps AI systems understand the intent behind user queries instead of relying on exact keyword matching. It uses embeddings, vector representations, and natural language processing (NLP) to map words by meaning. 

By doing this, semantic search retrieves the most relevant documents even if the query phrasing isn’t perfect. Unlike traditional information retrieval methods, semantic search ranks results based on context and relationships, and produces answers that genuinely make sense. 

Teams can also explore [choosing the best model for semantic search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/choosing-the-best-model-for-semantic-search) to refine their search architecture.

## What is RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)?

[Retrieval-augmented generation](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) (RAG) combines information retrieval and generative AI to create more factual and contextually relevant responses. It retrieves relevant documents from an external knowledge base or vector database using embeddings before passing them over to the large language model (LLM). 

From there, the LLM uses the retrieved context and ensures that the response accuracy is high and the hallucinations are nonexistent. 

In short, RAG augments the model’s knowledge with real data, making responses more trustworthy and domain-specific.

## How does semantic search work?

[Semantic search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/semantic-search) goes beyond keyword matching by understanding the meaning and intent behind those keywords through contextual relationships.

![How Semantic Search Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_Semantic_Search_Works_77696c3be8.png)

* **Step 1:** Semantic search converts text into embeddings. Each query and document is transformed into dense [vector representations](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-are-vector-embeddings) that capture semantic meaning.
* **Step 2:** Then, it compares embeddings. The system measures cosine similarity or Euclidean distance between the user query and stored vectors to find the most relevant results.
* **Step 3:** Finally, a retriever ranks documents not just by word overlap but also by conceptual closeness, bringing up the absolute best matches.

This process helps users find relevant information even when they aren’t sure of the exact wording needed to get what they’re looking for.

## How does RAG work?

RAG connects advanced retrieval systems with LLMs to produce answers that the users are looking for. 

![A graphic showcasing how RAG works.](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_RAG_Works_b6a617b59f.png)

Let’s see how it works:

* **Step 1:** First, the data is embedded and indexed. Documents from various data sources are split into chunks, converted to vector embeddings, and stored in a vector database.
* **Step 2:** When a user query is submitted, the LLM first evaluates whether it can answer the query on its own. If it needs additional context to provide a satisfactory answer, this is where RAG comes into play.
* **Step 3:** The RAG retriever doesn’t search through the internal vector database. It can access external knowledge bases or even search the internet to find relevant documents.
* **Step 4:** Once RAG provides more context, the LLM uses both the query and the retrieved context to generate more relevant answers. 

As a result of this whole cycle, the answers you get are not only relevant but up-to-date as well.

## What is the difference between semantic search and RAG?

The main difference between semantic search and RAG is what they return. Semantic search only finds specific information, while RAG provides an explanation, enhancing the response to the user query. 

Semantic search works by matching user queries to document vector embeddings using similarity metrics such as cosine or Euclidean distance. It's super-efficient, fast, and great for providing direct answers closely related to the user query.

RAG, on the other hand, feeds retrieved context to a large language model to compose a more elaborate answer. This added step aims to reduce AI hallucinations and improve accuracy.

The table below highlights other key distinctions between the two:

![A table highlighting the key differences between semantic search and RAG.](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/Semantic_search_vs_RAG_828bd84d6d.png)

You can also explore different [RAG types](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types) to understand how architectures vary in retrieval and generation workflows.

## What problems does semantic search solve?

Keyword-based retrieval has always had limitations. Semantic search addresses this limitation by covering a broader domain than just literal keywords. 

Here’s what it solves:

* **Intent detection:** It interprets what the user means, not just what they type. 
* **Disambiguation:** Semantic search removes ambiguity and distinguishes between words with multiple meanings by analyzing their embeddings.
* **Better recall and precision:** It retrieves relevant documents even when queries use different phrasing. 
* **Multilingual and domain-specific results:** Diversity plays a huge role in getting the correct answer to the user. Semantic search adapts across knowledge bases and domain-specific datasets without manual rules.
* **Improved user experience:** Users love semantic search because it ranks relevant information intuitively, helping them find what they need faster.

By combining natural language processing (NLP) and vector embeddings, semantic search ensures users get the results they need.

## What problems does RAG solve?

RAG addresses the main challenges of retrieval and generation by grounding large language models in real data:

* **Hallucinations:** RAG retrieves relevant documents before generation, reducing the risk of made-up or unsupported answers.
* **Outdated knowledge:** It connects to external knowledge bases to keep responses accurate and up to date.
* **Context limitation:** It provides retrieved context beyond the LLM’s memory, thereby improving factual grounding.
* **Complex reasoning:** It enables the model to combine multiple information sources to produce multi-step answers.
* **Trust and explainability:** It cites its sources, ensuring responses are transparent and verifiable.

By combining semantic retrieval with generative models, RAG helps users get precise, context-aware answers rather than vague summaries, using techniques described in our [RAG techniques](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-techniques) article.

## Can semantic search be used without RAG?

Yes, semantic search can work perfectly well without RAG in many real-world applications. It’s often used when retrieving relevant information is sufficient and generating new text isn’t necessary.

For instance, knowledge bases, search engines, and customer support chatbots rely on semantic search to quickly find the most relevant documents. It’s also used in question-answering systems, e-commerce search, and internal document retrieval, where users want direct access to existing content rather than a generated summary.

Because it operates only on vector embeddings and retrieval algorithms, it’s lightweight, scalable, and cost-efficient.

However, when users expect natural language answers or context synthesis across multiple documents, semantic search alone falls short. That’s when RAG becomes the logical next step.

## Can RAG work without semantic search?

Yes, it can, but it’s not ideal. RAG can technically operate using keyword retrieval or metadata filtering instead of semantic search, but the results are less precise. 

Without vector embeddings or semantic similarity, the retriever may fetch documents that match words but miss intent. And intent is the key in any retrieval.

Some teams use BM25 or hybrid search engines as the retrieval layer for smaller or domain-specific datasets where context is already well structured. This approach simplifies infrastructure and lowers cost, but limits recall accuracy and context coverage.

Skipping semantic search means the model depends more on the generator to interpret data. This is a risky tradeoff that can lead to hallucinations or shallow grounding. 

For most real-world RAG systems, semantic search is the foundation that makes retrieval meaningful before generation is even a thought.

## What are the pros of semantic search?

You already know the accuracy aspect of semantic search. Let’s look at some more pros:

1. **Understands user intent way better:** Semantic search interprets user queries based on meaning, so the retrieved results are better than in plain keyword matching.
2. **Deals with ambiguity like a pro:** Through NLP, it can distinguish between different meanings, such as ‘Apple,’ the company, versus ‘apple,’ the fruit.
3. **Enables scalability:** Semantic searchcan retrieve results quickly and accurately, even across large datasets.

Semantic search is the foundation for both modern search technologies and RAG systems.

## What are the pros of RAG?

RAG provides language models with a way to remain factual, grounded, and context-aware without retraining every time new data arrives. 

Let’s look at some pros of RAG: 

1. **Has access to real-time knowledge:** It retrieves relevant documents from external knowledge sources.
2. **Goodbye hallucinations:** By relying on answers from the retrieved context, RAG minimizes the introduction of made-up or outdated information.
3. **Adapts to various domains easily:** It easily plugs into domain-specific datasets, from medical records to legal documents, without the need to fine-tune the LLM.

Overall, RAG bridges semantic search and generative AI to help teams create applications that not only find data but explain it in natural language.

## What are the limitations of semantic search?

Let’s look at some semantic search limitations. 

1. **Complex queries might result in ambiguity:** Useful as it is, semantic search can falter when queries are too extensive.
2. **Costly if you want to handle massive datasets:** Creating and updating vector embeddings for large datasets demands increasing amounts of resources, which can be expensive.
3. **Potential for low-quality results:** If the stored data is sparse or of poor quality, you might get low-quality results.
4. **Generative reasoning is lacking:** It can’t produce detailed answers, which makes it less helpful in question-answering or chatbot use cases.

These limitations make semantic search excellent for discovery, but not enough when users expect complete, natural-language answers.

## What are the limitations of RAG?

RAG is renowned for its accuracy, but the cost of this accuracy is the added layers of complexity. 

Let’s explore some other limitations of RAG:

1. **Higher latency and cost:** Multiple API calls that enable RAG to be so effective come with hefty charges.
2. **Variable retrieval quality:** If relevant documents are missing or poorly embedded, the LLM will still hallucinate.
3. **Complex infrastructure:** With increasing overhead from vector databases, chunking, and retrieved context pipelines, the RAG system can become really complex.
4. **Difficult to evaluate:** You need continuous assessment of the RAG system to maintain retrieval quality and accuracy.

If you’re working in high-stakes domains that involve knowledge-based systems, RAG is perfect. But it might be a bit too much for simpler applications.

## How is semantic search evaluated for effectiveness?

Semantic search effectiveness is measured by how accurately it retrieves and ranks relevant documents for a given user query. After all, that’s what it is for.

The primary metrics include precision (how many retrieved results are relevant) and recall (how many relevant results were retrieved). 

![A graphic explaining precision and recall, two primary search evaluation metrics.](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/Precision_and_recall_9d1f66c31e.png)

Other factors, such as Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) help assess ranking quality.

Teams also use user satisfaction surveys or click-through rates (CTRs) to measure success. These evaluations often compare how well embeddings, retrievers, and algorithms capture intent across datasets.

In short, good semantic search is about balancing accuracy, relevance, and scalability.

## How is RAG evaluated for effectiveness?

Evaluating a RAG system requires measuring not only retrieval accuracy but also how well generated answers remain grounded in the retrieved context.

The key metrics for this include factual accuracy, grounding score, and hallucination rate (the frequency with which the LLM adds unsupported information). Teams also track context precision and coverage to assess how the retrieved chunks influence the model’s response.

Other evaluation methods test retrieval quality, latency, and user trust over time. These insights help teams balance precision and performance across different data sources.

For a deeper look into evaluation frameworks, read our guide on [RAG evaluation](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-evaluation), which breaks down real-world techniques for measuring grounded generation.

## What are the latest trends in semantic search and RAG?

There’s an upward trend in the popularity of both semantic search systems and RAG. Especially now, when AI and LLMs are a core part of almost every enterprise application. 

The two major trends you need to keep up with are:

1. **Integration between LLMs and retrieval systems:** Modern retrieval systems have developed the capability to integrate LLMs and deliver answers that are not only more accurate but also sound conversational and almost human.
2. **Hybrid approach to retrieval:** By combining keywords, vector embeddings, and reranking techniques, we can achieve significant improvements in precision and recall across both structured and unstructured data.

This set of trends, along with some others, contributes to improving RAG daily. In essence, they are all about making AI search engines more intelligent and user-friendly.

## Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

The following FAQs should address any remaining confusion about semantic search and RAG.


### Is RAG the same as semantic search?

No. Semantic search ranks documents based on their meaning. RAG retrieves the documents first, and then uses this retrieved context to generate answers the users are looking for. 


### Why is semantic search important for AI?

Semantic search improves how AI understands user queries. It makes the AI interpret the intent behind the search instead of just taking the keywords at face value. Naturally, this brings a significant boost in accuracy and the user experience.


### Why is RAG used in generative AI?

Generative AI needs the right context to generate information. RAG helps LLMs combine retrieved information with the user query to generate the required answers. This significantly reduces AI hallucinations and lays the foundation for real-time AI agents or chatbots.


### What is the role of embeddings in semantic search?

Embeddings are the backbone of semantic search because they convert text into vector representations that capture meaning. They enable the retriever to find semantically related content even when users don’t use the exact keywords in their search. You can think of them as interconnected neural networks.


### What is the role of embeddings in RAG?

In RAG systems, embeddings serve as connectors. They connect the retriever and the generator. They help retrieve the most relevant documents that match a query’s meaning before passing them to the LLM to generate an informed answer.


### How does semantic search compare to vector search?

Semantic search uses advanced algorithms to understand the meaning of words and sentences. It's like a map where similar ideas are close together. This helps it find answers that make sense, even if the exact words aren't there, because it understands what you're trying to find, as detailed in this [semantic vs. vector search](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/semantic-vs-vector-search) article.

## Harnessing the power of precision

The main goal of most advancements today is to guide AI towards greater precision.

RAG and semantic search are both unique in their own ways, with distinct sets of pros and limitations. However, this does not stop them from being a force to be reckoned with when used together in a hybrid setting.

Semantic search vs. RAG: A side-by-side comparison

When working with large language models, achieving accurate, relevant results depends on several factors. 

Two of them are Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and prompt engineering. 

RAG helps generate better answers by allowing the generative AI model to retrieve information from external knowledge sources, keeping responses fact-based and up to date. 

Prompt engineering, on the other hand, focuses on how you communicate with the AI to produce clear and context-aware answers. 

* RAG adds new knowledge without retraining, whereas prompt engineering improves the model’s use of its existing knowledge.
* RAG works well for research, legal, healthcare, and customer support; prompt engineering is well-suited for summarization, creative writing, Q&A, and data formatting.
* RAG is complex and can be slower, while prompt engineering is cheaper but requires skill.
* RAG requires more setup and maintenance, but prompt engineering is faster and cost-effective.

Choosing the right approach depends on what you want: accuracy, freshness, or speed. Often, combining both gives the best results. Let’s dig deeper into this. 

## What is prompt engineering?

Prompt engineering is the art of crafting clear instructions for large language models (LLMs) to achieve the best possible results. 

Think of it like learning to ask the right questions. A vague prompt might produce a generic answer, while a carefully worded one can give you precisely what you need. 

Prompt engineering is about understanding how the gen AI model interprets instructions and using that insight to guide it toward your desired output. 

## What is RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)?

[RAG](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/what-is-rag) is a technique that improves LLM outputs by providing them with access to external resources. This could include databases, documents, and APIs. Instead of relying solely on what they were trained on, RAG allows AI models to access additional information when generating answers. 

For instance, we can give an AI model both memory and internet search skills, so that it knows today’s date and searches the internet for the most recent data.

## How does prompt engineering work?

Prompt engineering is about learning how to interact with an artificial intelligence model in a way that generates the best possible response.

As a rule of thumb, it is good practice to provide the LLM with enough context to answer your questions. LLMs are trained to follow user instructions, and they do so within the context they have. 

For example, if you ask an LLM to act like a hip-hop artist, its response will sound like one. Ask it to write like a Nobel Prize–winning author, and it will adapt its responses accordingly.

Finding the right prompt involves experimentation. If the answer from an initial prompt is not accurate, you can refine your prompt to provide more context and make it clearer. You may also check for noise or contradictory statements and eliminate them. 

For example, if you do not have a background in science, instead of asking the model to “Explain photosynthesis,” you could say, “You have over a decade of experience teaching biology. Explain photosynthesis like you are teaching someone in eleventh grade.” The goal is to give the AI enough context and direction to produce relevant responses.

## How does RAG work?

RAG works by combining retrieval and generation so that an LLM can answer using external facts. 

In the retrieval phase, RAG searches external sources to find the most relevant information, and in the generation phase, the model uses that retrieved data to craft an accurate response. 

![How RAG Works.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/How_RAG_Works_e26007ec0c.png)

Here is how the process goes, step-by-step:

1. A user types in a search query. 
2. A retriever searches a document store or database for information that matches the query. 
3. The information is ranked, and the best is selected to form a context. 
4. The original question and the context are sent to the LLM. 
5. The model generates a response grounded in the retrieved information. 
6. Finally, a verifier or re-ranker checks the model's outputs before they are returned. This is optional.

## What are the main differences between RAG and prompt engineering?

The main difference between RAG and prompt engineering is how they help AI models produce better answers. 

Different [RAG types](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-types) improve accuracy by allowing the model to retrieve real-time data before generating a response. 

Prompt engineering focuses on phrasing and optimizing questions to get the best result from the model’s existing knowledge. 

To sum it up, RAG gets its information externally, while prompt engineering uses information already within the AI model.

![RAG vs. Prompt Engineering.png](https://unable-actionable-car.media.strapiapp.com/RAG_vs_Prompt_Engineering_a00885536d.png)

Now, let’s discuss the benefits and challenges of using RAG and prompt engineering.

## What are the advantages of prompt engineering?

Prompt engineering can help users get the most out of AI tools without requiring additional data. 

Here are some of the advantages:

* **Better control over responses:** You can guide the AI model to produce more relevant outputs by learning how to phrase questions effectively. For example, a marketer can ask ChatGPT to ‘act like an expert marketer in a Fortune 500 company and write an email to promote a new product,’ and receive a good draft email immediately.
* **Works across different tasks:** Prompt engineering can be applied across various sectors. It is helpful for specific tasks such as coding, summarizing reports, writing essays, and even brainstorming ideas. 
* **Saves time and effort:** Making your input prompts clearer reduces the need for multiple iterations. Instead of constantly reworking the answer, a well-crafted prompt helps the AI deliver the desired result in a single go.
* **Encourages creativity and personalization:** Prompt engineering gives users the freedom to set their own tone or style. This makes it an excellent tool for writers, designers, or educators who desire unique results.


## What are the advantages of RAG?

RAG has several benefits that make AI responses more helpful in real-life situations.

* **Improves accuracy:** RAG reduces the risk of errors by pulling information only from verified external sources.
* **Access to up-to-date information:** RAG can retrieve current information from live databases or documents. This makes it perfect for fast-changing topics, such as the news.
* **Better context understanding:** RAG provides the AI model with additional background information before generating an answer, helping it better understand the question and respond more accurately.
* **Flexibility across domains:** Because it can connect to various data sources, RAG can easily adapt to resource-intensive, specialized fields like healthcare, agriculture, or finance while still delivering insights tailored to each domain.
* **Reduced AI model training costs:** Since RAG relies on retrieval rather than constant retraining, organizations can update knowledge from data sources rather than rebuilding the entire model for each process.

## What are common challenges with prompt engineering?

Prompt engineering is a powerful skill, but it is not always straightforward. Generating the perfect response from AI often takes creativity and practice. 

Here are some common challenges:

* **Inconsistency in results:** Just a slight change in wording can completely alter the AI’s answer. Also, because AI is non-deterministic, what works once may not work the same way next time, making it hard to achieve consistent responses.
* **A need for expertise:** Crafting a strong prompt requires some level of domain knowledge and an understanding of how the AI model interprets instructions. Newbies may give generic prompts, leading to generic AI responses.
* **Can be time-consuming:** Refining your prompts through trial and error can take a long time, especially when dealing with complex tasks. If not properly managed, this can slow down your workflow or even reduce your productivity.
* **Model limitations:** AI systems only know the training data on which they were built. Therefore, even the best prompt cannot fix a model whose knowledge base is lacking. Such situations lead to hallucinations or outdated responses.

## What are the common challenges with RAG?

Some challenges can make RAG implementation difficult, even though it greatly improves accuracy and relevance. 

Here are some of them:

* **System complexity:** RAG can be complex to set up and maintain, especially for non-technical teams. It requires [connecting a retriever and a database to the LLM](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/how-do-you-search-in-a-database-with-llm).
* **Integration overhead:** Integrating a RAG system into an existing application or workflow often requires extra resources. You have to set up the RAG infrastructure while maintaining the external data sources at the same time.
* **Latency and speed issues:** Balancing accuracy with performance can be challenging with RAG. Since it searches and retrieves data before generating a response, it can be slower than the traditional models, especially when handling large datasets. 
* **Information retrieval error:** Sometimes a RAG system retrieves the wrong documents, leading to answers that sound confident but are based on inaccurate data. This makes proper data indexing and filtering critical when setting up the RAG system.

## What are examples of prompt engineering use cases?

Prompt engineering can be applied in many real-world situations to make AI tools more valuable and efficient: 

* **Question answering:** Businesses use prompt engineering to make chatbots and help desks smarter. With the right prompt, an AI agent can provide clear and accurate responses to customer or employee questions.
* **Text summarization:** It is excellent for turning long text into short but meaningful takeaways. For instance, you can say, ‘Summarize this report in three simple points,’ and save hours of reading time.
* **Data conversion:** Prompt engineering can help you quickly clean or restructure information. For example, changing your raw notes into a professional report.
* **Creative writing:** Writers use prompts to get innovative ideas, explore storylines, or overcome creative block.

## What are examples of RAG applications?

[RAG tools](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/rag-tools) are powering many of the apps we use today. Here are a few ways RAG is being used in the real world:

* **Customer support systems:** Many customer service chatbots now use RAG to fetch real answers from company manuals. So when you ask your bank’s chatbot about your account details, it gives you the exact information instead of a generic reply.
* **Legal research:** Law firms use RAG to review thousands of case files and contracts in seconds. A lawyer can ask about precedents for a case and instantly get relevant examples instead of manually searching the archives.
* **Healthcare and medical support:** Doctors and researchers use RAG to find the latest studies, treatment guidelines, and patient data. This enables them to make more informed medical decisions.
* **E-commerce product comparison:** RAG is used by e-commerce companies to compare products. It retrieves product specs, reviews, or prices from the database and generates personalized recommendations.

## Can RAG and prompt engineering be combined?

Yes, RAG and prompt engineering work better together. 

For example, when someone asks, ‘Summarize this customer’s issue in three bullet points,’ a RAG setup might pull a customer’s record from the database, and a good prompt allows the LLM to summarize only the issues returned. 

In legal work, RAG can find relevant cases, which are then combined with a prompt that says, ‘Compare these rulings and highlight the key differences.’ This provides a concise, actionable comparison rather than a long list that might be difficult to interpret. 

In healthcare, RAG retrieves patient history and recent medical studies, while prompts ensure the results follow clinical reporting standards.

RAG handles the ‘what’ (or the facts), and prompt engineering handles the ‘how’ (or the presentation). When used together, they make answers both relevant and accurate.

## What are the costs of RAG vs. prompt engineering?

The costs of setting up RAG and prompt engineering are different. 

RAG can be expensive to implement because it requires additional infrastructure (such as a database, a retrieval system, and integration tools). There is also a maintenance cost for updating data sources, handling storage, and ensuring the retrieval system stays accurate and fast. 

Prompt engineering, on the other hand, is far cheaper because it mainly involves using your time and skill. You have to learn how to design effective prompts and also test them for consistent results. There is no need for new servers, APIs, or databases, making it suitable for quick, low-cost projects.

RAG requires more upfront investment but delivers higher accuracy, while prompt engineering is cost-effective and easily scalable for smaller applications.

Want to decide whether to use RAG or prompt engineering? Let’s see the factors you should consider when choosing.

## How do you choose between RAG and prompt engineering?

Choosing between RAG and prompt engineering depends on what you need from your system and the kind of resources you have. 

Here is a simple decision guide to use:

* **Check if you need fresh data:** RAG is the way to go if your answers must include the latest information. But if you are working with general knowledge that doesn't change often, prompt engineering should be sufficient.
* **Weigh your accuracy and reliability needs:** For fields like healthcare, law, or finance, where mistakes can be costly, RAG is safer because it cites real sources. Prompts alone cannot always guarantee accuracy. 
* **Consider your time, budget, and skills:** RAG takes more setup and maintenance, while prompt engineering requires creative thinking and practice. If you have limited resources, then go with prompt engineering.
* **Balancing performance and workflow:** RAG systems can be slightly slower since they search external data before responding, but the answers are usually more accurate. Prompt engineering is quicker and is perfect for lightweight applications where speed matters more than depth.

## How does RAG compare to fine-tuning?

The main difference between [RAG and fine-tuning](https://www.meilisearch.com/blog/fine-tuning-vs-rag) is that RAG pulls in fresh information from external sources when needed, while fine-tuning actually trains the model to learn that knowledge internally.

With fine-tuning, you take a pre-trained model and feed it domain-specific data (such as legal documents or customer records) so that it learns the patterns and language of that field. This makes it faster and consistent. 

The limitations are that it is expensive to train, requires lots of clean data, and must be redone whenever new information comes in.

RAG, on the other hand, does not retrain the model. Instead, it connects to a database or document store and retrieves the most relevant information whenever a question is asked. This ensures the answers are up to date and adaptable to new topics.

## How does prompt engineering compare to fine-tuning?

The main difference between prompt engineering and fine-tuning is that prompt engineering focuses on how you ask the model your question to get the best response, while fine-tuning changes what* *the model actually knows.

With prompt engineering, you are not retraining anything. You are instead crafting the proper instructions to guide the model’s behavior. It is fast, affordable, and flexible, making it perfect for tailoring outputs to specific needs. 

The catch is that results can vary greatly depending on how well the prompts were written.

Fine-tuning, on the other hand, takes things deeper. You train the model on new data so it permanently learns that knowledge. This gives you consistency and expertise but comes with higher costs, more setup time, and the need to continuously retrain to stay up to date.

## RAG vs. prompt engineering: and the winner is...

The reality is that both techniques shine in their own way. 

RAG is your go-to tool when accuracy and up-to-date information matter most, since it can retrieve from live data sources. Prompt engineering is the fastest, most flexible way to generate outputs without retraining any model.

If you are building something that needs freshness, go with RAG. For quick, creative control, prompt engineering takes the lead. 

Meilisearch latest news and company updates